What an interesting debacle we have fallen into with these town hall meetings.
I've been watching a few on youtube. Swastikas painted on a sign in the GA governor's headquarters. Screaming. Shouting. Politicians losing their temper and screaming and shouting.
Is this what we have become?
A couple things strike me about this -
First, I recall a Thomas Friedman column called "China for a Day," in which he argues how nice it would be if our government could actually get something done. In this age of 24 hour news networks, year round campaigning, and special interest groups, our government doesn't seem to be able to get anything significant done. How nice would it be to be like China for 24 hours and actually get something done - I believe Friedman was referring to the government's inability to approve tax credits for green companies.
Second, why do we always hate the person in charge? Reading some of the commentary on youtube gives truth to my old mantra of "the masses are asses." When Obama is in, the conservatives insist that he is a socialist/Muslim intent on turning us into a hybrid Russia/middle eastern country. Yet, when Bush was in - and if you search the videos I bet this would be fact - I'm sure the liberals were ripping him a new one for his lust for oil or his struggles with speaking in public and so on.
I'm reminded of a shirt Axl Rose wore on national TV during the Freddie Mercury tribute concert in the spring in 1992 - it had a picture of Christ with a crown of thorns and it read "Kill Your Idols." My mom was outraged by this, but a sliver of it rang true to me - how many of our idols or leaders or people of power do we (or some nut job) assassinate?
Now we have pictures of Obama looking like the Joker with white make up and a Glasgow Smile under the heading of socialism.
If we cannot even conduct a civil town hall meeting, do you really think any president could remove guns from the nut jobs who hoard them in their basements waiting for the terrorists - or black people from the inner city - to drop in and try and pry them from their cold dead hands or turn our democracy into a socialist government? The American people would never let that happen.
Third, after learning all about Hoover's and Roosevelt's trials during the Great Depression, I've seen all of this controversy over health care and the cries of socialism before.
Do some research and you'll see that there was a significant rise in the call of socialism in America (led by our own MN governor at the time!). I always thought of Roosevelt and his famed 100 Days and New Deal as this breath of fresh air that saved the day.
Not exactly.
Vast numbers of people HATED Roosevelt and what he was trying to do! This has to sound familiar to Bush when he suffered the lowest approval rating of any president or what Obama must be going through now as he tries to reform health care.
And remember where we got social security (hey, what's that first word in that phrase?) and many other government run programs (Medicare) that if you stripped from people today, they'd flip over. Yet, Roosevelt failed to get health care truly run by the government - as did Clinton. We'll see if the present administration can fare any better.
Of course, people today think they have all the answers -when in truth - NONE of us have any clue what will really happen because we think we can base what will happen today because of what happened in the past. Some of that might be true, but if we really could base the future off the past, wouldn't we be more successful at it than we already are?
It seems to me the only thing we really are successful at is watching an event unfold and then - after it's happened mind you - saying what we should have done instead. That's not the same thing.
I love this quote that I heard yesterday regarding why we think we know so much and can predict what will happen - "the biggest impediment to understanding the past is that we know their future."
Sure our distant relatives in the future will critique our faults and missteps today - just as we do when we criticize past generations.
But none of us have an inkling of what the future will hold. Nor will we ever. Let's just be rational and patient and make logical and thoughtful analysis. Let's stop spraying swastikas and acting like morons at town meetings (and that goes for the crowds and the politicians). Let's act like more humanely and remember our place in the grand scheme of this.
And remember this great quote, which also takes a stab at predicting the future, though I think it's one we should try and avoid - "if all the insects were to disappear from the planet, within five years all life would cease to exist. If all humans were to disappear from the planet, within fifty years every form of life would be thriving."
1 comment:
I've been following this debate for quite awhile and watching the town meetings with great interest. I'm not sure what you've been watching, but I watch FOX news which I believe is the most balanced coverage. I've not seen swastickas or the like, but I have seen plenty of highly concerned people--many of them older citizens--voicing their concerns about the healthcare reform bills. This is their right as Americans. The reason most of them are concerned is because the VAST majority of politicians have not even read through the bills. Can you imagine signing off on a bill of this magnitude without even reading the fine print? Being the bill is over 2,000 pages long (which is ridiculous), I just don't believe that this process can be rushed.
I can totally empathize with the concerns senior citizens on medicare have when the bill includes a $50 billion dollar CUT in medicare funding while at the same time there will be a 30% increase in people eligible for medicare in the next 10 years (as the baby boomers reach retirement age).
The healthcare reform bill benefits teens through people in their 40's...In other words--healthy people. It in no way benefits the elderly, the handicapped or the marginalized.
Also, the fact that the bill places contains significantly less funding for specialists that we have now and more for GP's is a bit concerning. GP's are great, but if I have a heart problem or cancer or muscular dystrophy, I want to be able to see a specialist who specializes in that disease. And I want to be able to do it in a hurry so I can get proper treatment. Another concern with providing less funding for specialists is--who discovers the cures for diseases? It's not the GP's, but the specialists!
I'm not saying there shouldn't be some type of reform. I'm saying that people have a right to voice their concerns with the bill (and the major news groups are doing their best to put their own spin on things and are portraying the worst of the worst in protesters because they are so pro-Obama).
People also have a right to expect that their legislators READ the bills they sign and be familiar enough with the contents that they can hold an intelligent conversation about the contents. In a number of town meetings, the people were more aware of what was in the bill than the legislators.
Imagine Mom or Dad being told that their insurance wouldn't pay for their cancer treatment because lung cancer, for the most part, is terminal anyway. That, combined with their age (which, if you read the bill, is a highly contributing factor in determining whether treatments will be covered), would have offered them no hope/no future.
Post a Comment